2022/07/02

 

In the absurd indictment, the fictitious amount is said to be the criminal proceeds of religious fraud, and on the other hand, it is said that the legitimate income of cram school income is subject to tax. In the criminal court's third-instance verdict,it was found not guilty and no tax evasion. But the scrapped indictment was the basis for the NTB to pursue the tax for over 20 years.In the absurd indictment, the fictitious amount is said to be the criminal proceeds of religious fraud, and on the other hand, it is said that the legitimate income of cram school income is subject to tax. In the criminal court's third-instance verdict,it was found not guilty and no tax evasion. But the scrapped indictment was the basis for the NTB to pursue the tax for over 20 years.